amawta
Volver al blog
Producto

Presentamos EigenDB: Compresión de Embeddings 40x Sin Pérdida de Calidad

Cómo logramos 40x de compresión en embeddings vectoriales manteniendo >95% de precisión de búsqueda, reduciendo costos de $600/mes a $15/mes.

Amawta Labs

The Embedding Storage Problem

Vector databases have become essential infrastructure for modern AI applications. From semantic search to recommendation systems, embeddings power countless production workloads. But there is a fundamental challenge: storing billions of high-dimensional vectors is expensive.

Consider a typical RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) application with 1 billion documents. Using standard 1536-dimensional float32 embeddings, you are looking at roughly 6TB of raw storage—before accounting for indexes, replicas, or operational overhead.

40xRatio de compresión
>95%Precisión de búsqueda
~$15Costo mensual (1B vectores)

Our Approach

EigenDB takes a fundamentally different approach to embedding storage. Rather than treating vectors as opaque blobs of floats, we leverage the inherent mathematical structure present in embedding spaces.

The key insight: embeddings from the same model share structural properties that can be exploited for compression. This is not generic compression—it is compression designed specifically for the geometry of embedding spaces.

40xOriginal EmbeddingsEigenDB Format

How It Works

Our compression pipeline operates in three stages:

1. Structural Analysis

We analyze the statistical properties of your embedding space to identify compressible patterns. This is a zero-training process—no fine-tuning or model modification required.

2. Adaptive Encoding

Based on the analysis, we apply a specialized encoding that preserves the relationships between vectors while dramatically reducing storage requirements.

3. Fast Decoding

At query time, our decoding algorithm reconstructs approximate vectors with sub-millisecond latency, enabling real-time search with minimal overhead.

Embeddingsfloat32 × 1536CodificadorAnálisis estructuralSin entrenamientoAlmacenamiento40x comprimidoBúsquedaDecodificación rápida>95% accuracy

Accuracy vs Compression

The critical question: how much accuracy do you sacrifice for 40x compression? Our benchmarks across multiple embedding models and datasets show consistent results:

Recall vs Compression
98.5%
10x
97.2%
20x
96.1%
30x
95.3%
40x

At 40x compression, EigenDB maintains >95% recall@10 compared to uncompressed search. For most production workloads, this accuracy-compression tradeoff is highly favorable.

Cost Impact

The economic implications are significant. Here is a comparison for a production workload with 1 billion 1536-dimensional embeddings:

Comparación
Tradicional
EigenDB
Almacenamiento
~6 TB
~150 GB
Costo
~$600
~$15
Latencia
~100ms
~25ms

Beyond raw storage costs, compression reduces memory requirements for indexing, speeds up backup/restore operations, and enables deployment on smaller instance types.

When to Use EigenDB

EigenDB is ideal for large-scale embedding storage (>100M vectors), cost-sensitive production deployments, edge deployments with memory constraints, and applications where 95%+ accuracy is acceptable.

For applications requiring exact nearest-neighbor search or sub-millisecond latency on small datasets, traditional vector databases may be more appropriate.

Amawta Labs

Construyendo las bases matemáticas para la próxima generación de infraestructura de IA.